Why Do I Act The Way I Do?
How do you feel about attending college? Do you have a positive or negative reaction to that question, and has this reaction been stable over time? This reaction is called an attitude, which is a response towards something that lasts over time but can change (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Although it may seem like attitudes are the sole predictors of behavior, they are not (Azjen, 1991). In fact, the Theory of Planned Behavior model states that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control interact to create an intention that predicts one’s behavior (Azjen, 1991). Subjective norms are external or social pressures, whereas perceived control refers to one’s ability to behave a certain way (Azjen, 1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior also found that attitudes are more predictive of behavior when they are specific and strong (Azjen, 1991). Further, attitudes can become strong from a large amount of information on something, personal experiences, and when someone is personally invested in something (Azjen, 1991).
This
theory has reminded me of my choice to attend Southwestern University. My attitude
toward attending college was mostly positive from excitement, but also nervous
due to venturing far from my parents (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). All of my
close friends were going to college and many American teens go to college after
high school. I even knew someone who went to Southwestern a year before me. The
fact that my friends went to college and I had a connection at Southwestern are
the subjective norms that factored into my decision to choose SU (Azjen,
1991). Further, I had the opportunity to go wherever I wanted for college
because I got scholarships at the schools I applied to, my parents had the
ability to pay for me to attend college, and I liked all the universities I was
accepted to. These factors refer to my perceived control, which means I
was able to attend the school I wanted (Azjen, 1991). These variables
contributed to my intention to attend Southwestern University, which was
the strongest predictor of me actually attending SU (Azjen, 1991).
Another personal example that fits in the Theory of Planned Behavior is going to the
doctor’s office (Azjen, 1991). I dislike seeing the doctor, especially since I
have gotten older and attend appointments alone. This fear got stronger when I
passed out while getting my blood drawn. However, it is normal to see a doctor once
or twice a year and required for me to be able to get my medications refilled
and stay healthy. Although I have a negative attitude toward doctor’s appointments,
subjective norms and lack of control override my feelings in determining
my behavior of going to the doctor (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986; Azjen, 1991). It
is clear through these examples that attitudes are not the only
predictors of behavior, which validates the Theory of Planned
Behavior (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986; Azjen, 1991).
References
Azjen, Icek. (1991). The theory of
planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),
179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Petty, E. R., & Cacioppo, T. J.
(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
I have acted with honesty and
integrity in producing this work and am unaware of anyone who has not.
– Mara Strohl
N = 479
Comments
Post a Comment